| |
Our Advantage
 Experience You Can Trust
Professional Service
Affordable Price
100% Satisfaction Guarantee
|
|
|
- 12 Jan, 2008, The Times Of India
BANGALORE / MUMBAI: The Trademarks Registry has cleared an application moved by Original Choice Whisky, dealing a blow to liquor baron Kishore Chhabria’s efforts to stall one of the fastest growing spirits brands on its tracks...
- 11 Jan, 2008, WSJ.com
Any securitization lawyers out there looking for work? We’ve got a suggestion. Litigate domain-name disputes! We love domain-name disputes. You know, like when Nutrisystem files a complaint against some cybersquatter who registered www.nutrisystems.com? Or the when F. Hoffmann-La Roche, the maker of Valium, files a grievance against someone who registered www.prescriptionvalium.com? Or when The Donald goes after some dude who registered www.trumptajmahal.com?...
|
- January 11, 2008, The China Post
Around 350 employees of Idees Department Store stage a sit-in in front of its Taipei store on Nanking W. Road, protesting against Mega Holdings’ provisional seizure of Idees’ trademark rights...
|
- Jan 10, 2008 Eastday.com
The Italian-based Guccio Gucci S.P.A, one of the world's leading producers of luxury goods, is seeking 500,000-yuan (US$68,776) compensation from a local stationery maker, accusing the maker of using the Gucci trademark in its notebooks, Shanghai Daily reported...
|
- 4 Jan, 2008, straitstimes.com
LONDON - TWO English dentists have fought off an attempt by Lacoste to stop them from using a crocodile similar to the French fashion company's logo, Britain's trademark watchdog said on Thursday. The UK Intellectual Property Office confirmed that it had rejected an appeal by Lacoste SA against an earlier decision, saying the dentists' crocodile would not confuse consumers. The ruling was issued last month...
|
- December 28 2007 CNET News.com
A court in China has dismissed a trademark lawsuit filed against Google, according to a report on ChinaCourt.org that was translated into English and posted on Pacific Epoch.
|
June 10, 2007, Forbes.com
The Zhejiang provincial high court ruled May 30 that Pepsi had committed trademark infringement against Zhejiang Blue. Confirming that the Blue Storm name and an almost identical design to that used by Pepsi were registered by Zhejiang Blue as a trademark in 2003, the court ordered Pepsi to scrap its ad campaign and pay Zhejiang Blue 3 million yuan ($392,700). Pepsi was also ordered to make a public apology in local newspapers for the trademark infringement...
|
|
|
